Vista Capable sticker lawsuit gets class-action status

It looks like that little lawsuit over "Vista Capable" stickers on PCs could now be about to get quite a bit bigger, as a federal judge has now bestowed class-action status on the suit, which accuses Microsoft of misleading marketing. More specifically, as the AP reports, the suit alleges that the "Vista Capable" stickers slapped on PCs during the 2006 holiday season created an "artificial demand" for the computers, and "inflated prices for computers that couldn't be upgraded to the full-featured version of Vista." As we've seen, those stickers even took in at least one higher-up at Microsoft itself, who has made his thoughts on the program quite well known. While things are still obviously in the early stages, the law firm that filed the suit is now looking for others that feel they've been burned by the stickers, and ComputerWorld has the details on you can get involved at the link below.

MCD's mall plan near Jama Masjid sparks anger

New Delhi: On Friday, CNN-IBN broke the story on the threat to Jama Masjid from builders.

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi's plans to dig dangerously close to the monument to build a four-storey basement mall and parking area will damage the very foundations of the historic mosque.

The MCD's redevelopment plan has people enraged.

A day after CNN-IBN broke the story on the threat to Jama Masjid from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi's re-development plan for the area, strong reactions poured in from religious leaders to even politicians.

"We are grateful to CNN-IBN for exposing this plan. We are dead against the project and have registered our complaints with the authorities. We will do everything required to stop this," said Vidhan Sabha's Deputy Speaker, Shoaib Iqbal.

The Rs 1,200 crores re-development plan includes digging a 60-feet deep basement just 30 meters away from the historic Jama Masjid.

Experts believe that vibrations from the digging could damage the Jama Masjid foundations permanently.

The basement, a four-storey structure will have 600 shops at the top level and a three tier parking area to accommodate 9000 vehicles.

The idea has appalled most.

"It is an atrocious plan. We srongly oppose it," stated Jamait-e-Islami member Mujtaba Farooq.

The MCD has not done the compulsory structural and heritage impact assessment done for the project. The plan besides damaging the mosque will also destroy five other mazhaars in the 25-acre area between Red fort and Jama Masjid.

"It is an insult to Islam," said Muslim Personal Law Board member, S Q R Ilyas.

"This is the Jama Masjid, this is no ordinary masjid," protested activist and writer, Sadia Dehlvi.

For now, the MCD would want to stay out of the controversy after having conceived the project as would the Imam. But it may be difficult for them to turn a blind eye to such mounting protests for long.

Archbishop denies asking for Islamic law

Lawmakers across the political spectrum condemned Williams' statement, and Britain's tabloid newspapers reacted with fury, publishing pictures of people being beheaded under Shariah law and showing the carnage after Islamic suicide bombers attacked London's transport system in 2005.

In an editorial, The Sun newspaper called Williams "a dangerous threat to our nation" and said Muslim terrorists would "see his foolish ramblings as a sign that our resolve against extremism is weakening."

Williams acknowledged the "strong reaction in the media and elsewhere" but said in a message posted to his Web site he never intended to propose the creation of a parallel Muslim legal system.

Williams: He used Shariah to set example
Williams said his aim was "to tease out some of the broader issues around the rights of religious groups within a secular state" and was using Shariah law as an example.

He explained that Christians could not be expected to claim religious exceptions to secular rules — for example, by refusing to carry out abortions — unless they were willing to accommodate other religious traditions.

The heated reaction prompted some British Muslim groups to soften their initial support for Williams' plans and to complain about "Islamophobia" making British Muslims feel unwelcome in their homeland.

"The reaction has escalated into hysteria," said Catherine Heseltine, a spokeswoman with the Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK. "People hear the word Shariah and have an emotive conjuring of Taliban beheadings. It's seen as threatening Muslim outsiders coming in and imposing something on Britain."

In reality, she said, the changes Williams is advocating are not a high priority to British Muslims. For most Muslims here, she said, Shariah law deals primarily with questions of how Halal meat should be prepared and how marriages should be conducted.

Shariah is a wide-ranging Islamic code that has evolved over the centuries and is subject to differing interpretations in various countries. It deals with many aspects of daily life, including dress and dietary restrictions, and also codifies how to punish serious offenses.

The code imposes some restrictions on banking practices and in fact some British banks have introduced Shariah-compliant programs for certain types of transactions.

There are already some Shariah councils operating in Britain for Muslims who agree to abide by their rulings, but these are unofficial bodies not recognized by British law.

LONDON - The archbishop of Canterbury said Friday he never proposed the creation of a parallel Islamic legal system in Britain, as anger continued to simmer over statements he made seen as backing Islamic law.

Rowan Williams told the British Broadcasting Corp. in an interview aired Thursday that some aspects of Shariah law, a venerable Islamic code of conduct, already fit easily within the existing British legal system, and he agreed when asked if its implementation was inevitable.

Britain's media took the statement as broadly backing Shariah law, which delighted some British Muslims — and outraged almost everyone else.

Varsity girls’ woes

With growing awareness among the general public about the education of girls up to higher levels, more and more parents are sending their daughters to professional colleges and the universities. However, the problem of accommodation for female students especially in the hostels built in and around the Peshawar University is gradually becoming acute with every new academic session. At present the university has on its campus about five hostels for girls including the Fatima Jinnah and the Benazir Hostels in which, collectively speaking, a total of 1,986 female students are putting up. The last hostel that one can recall to have been built on the campus was in 2006 that could accommodate about 350 female students. With increasing rush of students and mounting political pressure on the provost and wardens, the hostel administration has to dump five to seven girls in a room that initially housed two to three students. The result is that more studious of the girls have to suffer academically as they are less able to concentrate on studies in a crowded hostel room.

Although gas supply is available, the hostel management does not allow the girls to use heaters even in freezing temperatures. With all the five hostels overflowing with female students, the quality of food has also become understandably poor. The situation becomes unbearable when the rush on washrooms clogs the drainage system and the inmates are put to tremendous inconvenience. Frequent power breakdowns have reduced the study hours to a ridiculously small duration which cannot obviously guarantee better grades in exams. If the university can order the construction of 100 new bungalows for its teachers, it can certainly afford to have more hostels for girls.